Loose Change 9/11

no matter how thoroughly their context is edited away, it's completely clear that many of the people being interviewed—especially those with the closest emotional ties to the subject matter—almost certainly were not given full context of the nature of the documentary being made. I don't mind it if some conspiracy theorists want to make a bad, illogical documentary, but when it's this clear that it's this emotionally manipulative of its interviewees, it ceases to provide any value to anyone.

This documentary should be considered fictionional narrative which focuses on a story that expects it's viewers to be naive and gullable. It's whole narrative is rife with misinformation, facts taken out of context, and a alternate storyline that has it's place on unicorn island with faeries and dragons. And it's whole story is blown apart if you have ever worked in a metal shop before. As steel is heated it becomes extremely flexible putting more and more weight on the rest of the structure breaking all the additional supports until the building gives way and collapses. It's basic fact, and structural engineers can secure all day but the simple fact is they do not account for every scenario. You can try but no matter what you do the design will always have a weakness or a oversight. Just ask those who design a building that can reflect light into a road or pool and can melt cars or burn people.

I loved it. There was plenty of great new footage even I haven't seen.The pacing was quick and sharp and I think it was a negative since there is so much to cover I wish they had used more time. The facts within the facts is what a buff on the topic live for and I appreciate the fact it wasn't the same movie but could have used a bit more details. Barry Jennings and the deaths following the investigations should have been mentioned in respect it was that interview that killed him (IMO)