Sam Finley
One of the best Bond films of all time, based on its staying fairly true to Fleming's original novel and Savalas' portrayal of Blofeld. Lazenby is one of the more underrated 007s, and would've been better had he not left after one film. Like many have said before, it would be considered the best of the series if Connery had stayed on. Still, this movie grabs and keeps your attention. Isn't that the mark of a good James Bond film? It's better than Connery's last two, both of Dalton's, and some of Moore's. That puts it pretty high on my list.
A Google user
When fans back then learned that George Lazenby would replace Sean Connery, they went nuts. So the producers made sure that everything else was absolutely spectacular...and it worked, somewhat. The action was great for the time albeit a little confusing, the villian was memorable and the setting was beautiful. Everything was perfect, except for one thing a lot of movies have trouble with: it is absolutely boring most of the time. At least the fighting was more convincing than Live And Let Die's.
4 people found this review helpful
Kat Silver
Personally, I don't really rate George. However, I do give him credit for the fact that he did all his own stunts. Overall, I believe that this is quite an underrated Bond film. The storyline was decent and I thought it was well based on the book, OHMSS, by Ian Fleming. Diana Rigg was amazing as Teresa (Tracy) and I thought the whole film was well set out in terms of the various events that took place! Worth buying!