Argento's Dracula

I'm going to be brief, as I just spent an hour and a half composing a long, detailed review, and just as I was making the final adjustment, one of my cats came over and plopped down on the mouse, which wiped out everything. Fortunately for Percy, it's 4:40 AM, and all the local taxidermists are closed. Argento's cinema is said to be about cinema, and a film that was originally titled "Dracula 3D" , especially in 2013 when it was no longer a novelty, is likely ABOUT 3D. There are reasons why I think it would work better in 3D. I just saw it in 2D. The second half is not as execrable as the first half would suggest, but you don't need to go out of your way for this. There are a ton of films you should see before this one, including full-on, mind-blowing, dick-swinging Argento masterpieces like Deep Red and Suspiria, or the Dracula of Christopher Lee, or Max Shreck, or the incomparable Bela Lugosi. However, if I ever get a chance to see Argento's Dracula is it was meant to be seen, I don't intend to pass it up.

Miriam Giovanelli's superb boobies- the only reason to watch this crackhead production (and no insipid black apes in sight)

Beautifully shot movie! Here you have a chance to view one of the greatest, horror director's of all time, take on Dracula! Nevermind the art snobs bad reviews of this movie. They never have, never will understand true art. Dario Argento, has and always will be ahead of his time.